Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | solomonwolf | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Leyline | arturcosta | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | popeville | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | bluelips | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Legends , 5 Color Battles , Boros Burn , Domain Control , Domain Overlords , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Goblins
Meta Performance Analysis
Thornspire Verge ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Thornspire Verge is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 35.62 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.2%. Thornspire Verge has a win rate of 72.7%, making it 0.7% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowstone Infusion | Instant | 5 | 100.0% | 5 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 6 | 92.9% | 5 |
| Cunning Coyote | Creature — Coyote | 5 | 86.7% | 4 |
| Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 16 | 77.8% | 10 |
| Tender Wildguide | Creature — Possum Druid | 5 | 71.9% | 2 |
| Huatli, Poet of Unity | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior Bard // Enchantment — Saga | 5 | 71.1% | 1 |
| Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 64 | 65.7% | 12 |
| Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 30 | 63.0% | 3 |
| Count on Luck | Enchantment | 33 | 61.5% | 5 |
| Cenote Scout | Creature — Merfolk Scout | 29 | 59.8% | 12 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Thornspire Verge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 6 | 90.6% | 74.7% | +15.9% |
| Case of the Crimson Pulse | Enchantment — Case | 3 | 6 | 84.8% | 72.1% | +12.7% |
| Magmatic Hellkite | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 6 | 89.5% | 82.2% | +7.3% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 16 | 82.8% | 75.5% | +7.3% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 5 | 82.4% | 76.1% | +6.3% |
| Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 9 | 80.4% | 74.8% | +5.5% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 12 | 76.3% | 72.2% | +4.1% |
| Turn Inside Out | Instant | 1 | 10 | 78.4% | 74.4% | +4.1% |
| Hired Claw | Creature — Lizard Mercenary | 1 | 29 | 74.2% | 71.5% | +2.8% |
| Leyline of Resonance | Enchantment | 4 | 8 | 76.1% | 73.6% | +2.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 2064 | 100.0% | 47.3% |
| Gruul Leyline | 165 | 86.4% | 56.0% |
| Gruul Delirium | 149 | 98.0% | 40.1% |
| Red Deck Wins | 106 | 7.8% | 40.6% |
| Gruul Surprise | 24 | 92.3% | 38.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.